ext_344536 ([identity profile] lunasky3.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] ratherastory 2011-03-02 11:57 pm (UTC)

If I pick to read dub-con, I usually go in thinking of it in terms of "I/we wouldn't have done it under a normal situation, BUT it was awesome hot and we probably might do it again."

Since it is a fandom only concept, I find it mainly used to create situations where characters who wouldn't normally have sex, have sex, ala "sex pollen/love spell."

For me at least, it's a lot of- will this character be okay afterwards?

BUT I do get seriously pissed off if something is supposed to be dub-con, and is more clearly non-con. Don't get me started on what happens when people turn BDSM into non-con and call it dub con >.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org