ratherastory (
ratherastory) wrote2010-08-24 01:59 pm
Entry tags:
FF.net strikes again
It's kind of funny, at this point.
Anonymous Reviewerâ„¢ at ff.net decided that I sold "Thicker Than Water" under false pretenses, because it was too sympathetic to Sam and not sympathetic enough to Dean's POV.
*snort*
I'd really like to know whether said reviewer actually read the summary before reading.
Anonymous Reviewerâ„¢ at ff.net decided that I sold "Thicker Than Water" under false pretenses, because it was too sympathetic to Sam and not sympathetic enough to Dean's POV.
*snort*
I'd really like to know whether said reviewer actually read the summary before reading.

no subject
I have been watching the wrong show! *shudders*
Now aren't you glad you posted your fic to a place where an anonymous reader could make assumptions as to your intentions and decide you're purposefully trying to undermine the entire Dean whump genre?
Ecstatic. ;)
I am totally a Sam-girl in disguise. You found me out. *hangs head in shame* Every person with a lick of sense in fandom knows that in order to be a proper fangirl you have to hate Sam.
no subject
Well, no, you don't have to hate Sam. But you do have to pick sides. You have to be a Sam-girl or a Dean-girl. Or a Misha Minion. If you like Sam, then you're totally not allowed to write Dean's man pain. That's subversive. You're trying to lure people in to your Sam-loving ways with your Dean whump as bait.
WELL NO MORE! WE'VE SEEN THROUGH YOUR DIABOLICAL PLAN!
. . . It occurs to me that I may not have actually commented on the story itself. I rather enjoyed it.
no subject
Also, I failed at asterisks because you didn't make that icon, someone else did and I got confused. :P
I'm glad you liked the story!
Furthermore, I need to come up with subtler diabolical plans, since everyone seems to have seen through this one.
no subject
There should be a subtle subversiveness for diabolical purposes online tutorial.
no subject