Gen Fic, for SCIENCE!

[ratherastory]

This is something of a follow-up to a conversation in my post about the hypothetical Gen Big Bang, in which I discovered to my shock and dismay that not everyone agrees on what constitutes gen fic!

Thus I am conducting a poll for SCIENCE!

Please spread the word, I am really curious to hear opinions on the subject.

[Poll #1666301]

Comments

[katwoman76.livejournal.com]

ITA. Just because the story isn't focussed on Romance or any kond of pairing, doesn't make the boys monks. I mean, if you can mention Dean's love for the Impala or food, you can also mention him flirting or having sex. It's just part of his personality. And just because a story is gen, it could still include the fact that Sam dated Jess or John and Mary are a couple.
If it's just a mention at the side, but not really something that the story focusses on in a main- or subplot, the story is still gen in my eyes.

And honestly, why does it always have to have ONE label. What's the problem with mixing it up a little.

[ratherastory.livejournal.com]

Labels are important! How else will people know what to read? ;)

[greeneyes-fan.livejournal.com]

After all, it would be catastrophic if I read something that didn't perfectly fit with my preformed boxes.